• Home
  • Podcast
  • Why You Need a Universal Design Consultant

Why You Need a Universal Design Consultant

The Serenity Smart Homes Podcast with Ashley Williams


Most smart home content starts with the technology. Ashley Williams flips that sequence. In the first episode of the Serenity Smart Homes Podcast, she introduces the universal design consultancy behind the show, the audiences she serves, and why the assessment comes first, the home comes second, and the technology comes third.

Listen to the audio-only version here

Show notes

Most smart home content starts with the technology. Ashley Williams starts somewhere else. In this first episode of the Serenity Smart Homes Podcast, she introduces the consultancy behind the show, why she sequences every engagement person first, home second, technology third, and what makes that order load-bearing rather than rhetorical. Twenty-plus years in enterprise tech, three credentialing frameworks, and a household that requires the same systems thinking she brings to clients. All of it points to the same question: what does this specific person, in this specific home, actually need?

What you’ll hear

  • Why most smart home content starts in the wrong place, and what that costs
  • The sequence Ashley uses on every engagement: person, home, technology
  • What an assessment is, and what makes it different from an installation
  • The audiences she works with: families supporting aging parents, property owners, neurodivergent households, and founders running everything at once
  • Why being honest about when technology is the wrong tool is part of the work

Timestamps

  • 00:00 Cold open
  • 00:31 Why most smart home content starts in the wrong place
  • 01:00 Introducing Ashley and the consultancy
  • 01:29 What enterprise tech taught her about systems and people
  • 03:10 What was missing from home technology
  • 03:37 What universal design actually means
  • 04:38 The audiences: families supporting aging parents, property owners, neurodivergent households
  • 06:34 Late-diagnosed AuDHD, solo parenting, and systems thinking
  • 07:30 What honest technology conversation sounds like
  • 08:02 What’s coming next, and how to follow along

Episode Transcript

Most smart home content starts with the technology. Which hub, which sensor, which protocol is winning today, whether your current setup is going to be obsolete in 18 months, and the honest answer is probably yes, depending on who made it. That’s not where I want to start with this. I want to start with the person and then the home, and then maybe if it’s the right tool for the job, the technology itself.

That sequence sounds obvious. It’s not how this industry operates, though, and the gap between how it sounds and how it actually works is the reason this podcast exists. My name is Ashley Williams. I’m a universal design consultant with a specialization in home safety and smart home technology, and I want to tell you a little bit about why that distinction matters and why I built my consultancy around it.

There’s a moment I keep coming back to. I’ve been in tech long enough to watch product rollouts happen, and I’ve seen them happen at different companies across the board. There was generally really big stakes a lot of times with these big product launches. We’re dealing with big infrastructure, and what kept happening was that the rollouts wouldn’t always go so well.

And the thing that I kept noticing every time was how little attention was paid to who actually had to live with the decisions being made in the conference rooms where these product rollouts were being decided. The people building the system were not the people who were using the system, and nobody in the conference room seemed to think that gap was a problem.

I thought it was a massive problem. And I want to be clear about what I mean by that, because I’m not talking about user experience in the UX designer sense. I’m talking about something more fundamental. I’m talking about whether the people designing a system have ever seriously asked, “What does a person’s life actually look like? What do they need this thing to do? And then what happens when the thing fails?” I carried that question with me from OpenDNS through Cisco, through Fastly, and eventually out the other side. When I left enterprise tech, I could have gone in a lot of different directions. What I kept coming back to was being in the home, specifically the gap between what homes could do for the people living in them and what was actually getting built.

The options that existed were either deeply technical and inaccessible, or they were consumer products designed around convenience and built on business models that had nothing to do with the homeowner’s interests. What was missing was an assessment framework. Someone who would come in, understand who was living there and what their life required, and then recommend, and then sometimes even build from that understanding.

Technology is just one tool in the process. Not the product, not the front door, just one tool. That’s what universal design is at its core. You design for the full range of human ability and need. You don’t design just for the average, not the able-bodied 35-year-old, not the tech enthusiast. You design for the person who is actually there in front of you, and you build something that can adapt as that person changes, because people change, circumstances change.

A home that was set up perfectly for someone at age 65 may need to be rethought at age 75. That’s not a failure. That’s just how life works. The assessment comes first, the recommendation comes second, and the implementation comes third. The sequence is the thing that separates a consultancy from an installer, and it runs through everything that I do.

All right, so let me make this concrete, because I think this is where a lot of home technology content loses people. The industry talks about homeowners like that’s one person. It is not just one person. The person who is managing her 78-year-old mother’s safety from two states away, who’s trying to figure out how to give her mother more independence, not less, while also sleeping through the night herself, that person doesn’t have a gadget problem. She has an assessment problem.

Nobody has sat down with her and asked, “What does your mother’s day-to-day actually look like? What are her real risk points? What would have to be true in order for her to stay in that home safely for another five years?” Then there’s the landlord with six units in South Jersey who keeps getting blindsided by water damage claims that insurance barely covers. That person doesn’t actually need a smart home. That person needs a property assessment and a targeted intervention that addresses the actual risk profile of those specific units.

And then we’ve got the family with a child who elopes. This family who spent years negotiating with their own nervous systems every time they hear a door open, that family needs a system designed around their specific situation. They don’t need a Ring camera. They don’t even need a Nest camera. They need something that fits what their life requires.

I know all of these people personally. I’ve worked with all of these people, and frankly, I am one of these people. I am a late diagnosed AuDHD solo parent running a business. I’ve spent years building systems for my own household because the alternative was straight chaos.

The thing I know about systems thinking is that it doesn’t care whether you’re running a company or running a home. The logic is the same. Often you’re doing both at the same time. So this podcast is going to move between those worlds: aging in place, property protection, privacy, neurodivergent households, and founders who are managing all of this and everything else.

The common thread is that all of it starts with an honest assessment of what’s actually needed and then works forward from there. There are a lot of home technology podcasts out there. A lot of them start from a technology position and work backwards towards the human. This one does the opposite. The credentials that I’ve built (CAPS, CLIPP, SHSS) are a paper trail of that same question: what does this person actually need? How do I know enough to answer that question well?

So when I talk about technology on this show, I’m going to be honest about what it does and what it doesn’t do, when it’s the right tool, when it’s being sold to you as the right tool and really it isn’t, when the cheaper version is genuinely going to get you to where you need to be, and then when the cheaper version is going to cost you more in three years because the company changed the business model or shut the product down altogether.

That’s the show. The intro episode is always the hardest one. The ones after this are going to get better. Next episode, I’m going to walk through the assessment framework I use with new clients, what I’m actually looking at when I walk into a home, what questions I’m asking, and why most people who think they need a smart home actually need something simpler first. That episode will give you a lens for evaluating your own situation before you spend a dollar on anything else.

If you want to follow along between episodes, I have a mailing list. The link to subscribe is in the show notes. That’s where I cover the same intersections that we’re exploring here: home, accessibility, privacy, and technology. You can also find me on LinkedIn, and that link is in the show notes as well.

And if you’re already sitting with a specific situation, a parent’s safety, a property that needs a harder look, a household that feels like it’s working against you instead of for you, I’m at serenitysmarthomesnj.com. The entry point is a free 30-minute consultation. We can start there and then go from there.

Thanks so much for being here for episode one, and I’ll talk to y’all again soon.